While in viscom class many aspects of the nature of the communication were discussed. Ultimately they can be summed up in three categories; research, audience and context.
These notes express a relationship between the image and the audience needs to specific. While thinking about these relationships I began thinking about two specific instances where visual communication failed, or at least misread.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b56a8/b56a8a89b50ec07d55a97a78604c9e8b189a9c3d" alt=""
One of the images was a movie poster for the awful, looking Michael Bay produced Ninja Turtles movie. However it wasn't the ugly looking turtles that caused issues. The poster showed the turtles jumping from a burning skyscraper and a release date of Sept. 11. Because of the connections of the turtles with New York City, the movie was reflecting imagery of terrorist attacks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4852b/4852b2665bb94e23fc544ee167f3046acf347eb5" alt=""
The other example was a tweet from the British embassy, celebrating the end of the War of 1812. What hurts the image is that the British did not understand who their audience. They were making a joke about the time they burnt down the White House, one of, if not the, symbol of American political power.
I figure both of these images can give a fuller example of the importance of understanding the relationships between images and the audiences they hope to reach.
No comments:
Post a Comment